objet technique page 34

So two examples tend to show that the differentiation goes in the same sense as the condensation of multiple functions in the same structure, because the differentiations of structures within the system of reciprocal cuasaltities permits the elimination (by integrating them into functionality) of the secondary effects that were once obstacles. The specialization of every structure is a specialisation of a functional positive synthesis, liberated of the secondary effects unresearched that ameliorates the function:

The technical object progresses by an interior redistribution of compatable funtions and unities, by replacing the unpredictability or the antagonism of the primitive distribution. The specialization is not acheived function by function, rather synergie by synergie; it is the synergetic group of functions and not a singular function that constitutes a true sub assembly of a technical object.....

In this way and for this reason, while the technical object becomes concrete, a function coul be filled by several assoicated structures synergetically, wheras in the primitive technical object and abstracte each structure is tasked to answer to a difined function and genrally a limit. The essence of conretisation of the technical object is in the organisation of functional sub assemblies in the total function; by way of this prinicpal, we can understand in what sense operates the redistribution of of functions in the network of different structures, both within the abstract and concrete opbjects: every structure responds to several functions; but in the abstract technical object, it only responds to a single, positive and integrated function within the assembly; in the concreted technical object, all of the functions respond to the function thant answer to an assembly. The marginal consequences of the function, eliminated or attenuated by adjustments to the abstract technical object, these are stages to the evolution of the technical object.